Let’s just take this from the top. The front page of Drudge this morning indicates that gaslighting is now being taken to a whole new level:
Trump beat Nikki Haley in the New Hampshire primary, as expected, despite the fact that nearly 75% of Haley’s voters were desperate Democrats pretending to be Republicans for the day, just to bump Trump off the ballot. How very democratic of them, right? Expect to see more of this kind of chicanery.
Regardless of the outcome, Dick Cheney’s protégé claims the race is “far from over” and vows to fight on—no doubt wearing 3-inch heels. Meanwhile, the leftist rag Politico absurdly suggests that Trump’s latest win means now “Biden gets the opponent he wants,” and the Biden camp is eager for a rematch.
Even an “ex-Trump aide turned Fox host” says New Hampshire was a “Good Night For Joe Biden”—on live TV!—and evidently this has “enraged” Trump:
But the greatest gaslighting of all, as highlighted in the first clip, are the headlines suggesting that Donald Trump is somehow mentally unfit to be president. Get this:
The fact that democrats are getting fed this line of drivel is an absolute mockery. Any self-respecting democrat should feel as if they’re getting spit in the face. How their media handlers think they can paint Trump as if he is in mental decline—while noticeably ignoring the obvious-to-everyone fact that crusty ‘ol Joe is but a shell of a man who can barely thread a sentence together—is really beyond me.
Just listen. Biden’s mental state has gone from bad to worse, and this is embarrassing:
And yet, brain-dead democrats still cheer for him. WHY?
Standing behind the angry old man shouting incoherently about “don’t mess with uhhiminauhwemerica”—unless you want to get “the benefit,” whatever the hell that means—is a sea of shamelessly propped up and hopelessly confused young women with signs that read: DEFEND CHOICE.
It seems unlikely that these poor miserable females grasp the fact that choosing Biden is really no choice at all. Do they believe this cognitively impaired corrupt career politician—the epitome of an old, senile, uber rich, privileged white guy—is really the very best candidate to represent millions of liberal Americans? Really?!
No, their choices have long been made for them. These tools don’t think for themselves, they simply parrot the narrative and vote for woke, because, well, they’re woke. Poor insufferable fools. I wish they could see how they’re being played.
But such is the contrast. Trump broke his own record, the record, for winning the most votes and the highest percentage of the population in the New Hampshire primary, ever. He even beat Bernie Sanders’ relatively historic numbers from 2016, which is a timely reminder of how the DNC gave democrat voters the shaft and rigged the election for Hillary Clinton—and then argued they had the right to do it!
The great irony, of course, is that rather than young liberals and academic idiots waking up to the fact that their Democrat Daddies are a bunch of no good, low down, dirty, nasty, lying crooks, these morons are so brainwashed they’re now standing in solidarity with a feeble, incompetent sock-puppet that represents everything they claim to hate. If that’s not proof of their disconnect from reality, I don’t know what is.
Snow is now black.
On July 11, 2022, I published TR 154 - How the Useful Idiots are Getting Used. The report elucidates how politicians are preying upon the unsuspecting masses using tactics straight out of the Communist Manifesto, and how this is all directly tied to the globalists’ Great Reset agenda. This passage speaks to the current discussion:
“Marx was a genius in his own right. He figured out how to use language with a ‘hidden, higher meaning’ to convince the useful idiots they were fighting for justice and equality, when in reality, they were simply consolidating power in the hands of a few power hungry elites. By using the peasants to do their bidding, communists try to come off as the champion of the little guy, all while conditioning them into servitude.
And it works. Why? Because a certain percentage of the human population is content to be slaves. They appreciate the protection and the provisions. They're given food and shelter, and all they have to do is do what they’re told. Then they are praised for being good humans, and that means they won't have to suffer at the hands of their masters (get beaten like slaves). It’s husbandry, pure and simple.”
In the two years since, I’ve realized this phenomenon goes way beyond a certain percentage of the population just being content to live like slaves. That’s a tale that’s old as time. It’s the “conditioning them into servitude” that has taken on a whole new meaning, given the science behind menticide and subconscious taming that’s come to light during the thousands of hours of interim research.
What’s happening in the world today, when you get down to it, is a scientific assassination of the human spirit. It was predicted to be possible long ago, but modern day tyrants have perfected the techniques to an evil art.
The “archenemy of humanity,” Lord Bertrand Russell, published his seminal work The Impact of Science on Society in 1953. The perspectives articulated throughout the book, I believe, formed the bedrock of the elitist-eugenicist-globalist-communist worldview that is so prevalent amongst the ruling class today. In other words, modern progressives adhere to his philosophies, hook, line, and sinker.
As such, we would be wise to revisit and reflect on his thinking. But first, to help connect the dots between the “impact of science” and the assassination of the human spirit, I want to share this quote from the UN’s Science for Society page:
“Science is the greatest collective endeavor. It contributes to ensuring a longer and healthier life, monitors our health, provides medicine to cure our diseases, alleviates aches and pains, helps us to provide water for our basic needs – including our food, provides energy and makes life more fun, including sports, music, entertainment and the latest communication technology. Last but not least, it nourishes our spirit.” (emphasis added)
To the uninitiated, those words would be inspiring and uplifting. To those who can see clearly through the flowery language, the words are riddled with the “hidden, higher meaning” that Marx was so fond of using. Regardless, the most pertinent aspect of this “collective endeavor” is the subtle, misleading suggestion that science “nourishes our spirit.”
Perhaps for a scientist, investigating the mysteries of the universe, science would nourish the spirit. However, that is not what is being suggested here. What’s being suggested is that science, as a collective endeavor, is an indispensable aspect of society (true) that rightly falls under the dominion of government (false).
Who else can ensure we have a longer and healthier life, monitor our health, provide us medicine, cure our diseases, and provide for our basic needs like food, water, energy and the latest communication technology?
If your instinct is to claim these societal functions rest in the expertise of individuals and capital markets, you would not be wrong. But in the hive mind of the collective, all of this absolutely must be regulated by the state, otherwise greedy capitalist corporations would prey upon the poor helpless peasants. That’s why we have governments, the thinking goes, to control such things and keep people safe.
From the collectivist point of view, only strong governments can ensure we have a longer and healthier life, monitor our health, provide us medicine, cure our diseases, and provide for our basic needs like food, water, energy and the latest communication technology—that is, only strong governments have the ability to regulate science, and by extension, it’s the role of the government to nourish the human spirit.
Don’t think for a second this is not exactly what the globalists believe.
Humanity needs to get over the idea that we have mysterious souls, remember? Human beings are just soulless “hackable animals,” according to the elites. That’s what they’d have us believe, because that is what they believe, which brings us back to Bertrand Russell and his famous quote:
“It is for future scientists to discover exactly how much it costs per head to make children believe that snow is black, and how much less it would cost to make them believe it is dark gray.” —The Impact of Science on Society
Russell goes on to say: “This subject will make great strides when it is taken up by scientists under a scientific dictatorship.” Let me ask you: are we not there now?
Friends, I’m here to tell you, this “scientific dictatorship” is more sinister than you might imagine. We need to understand where he was headed with all of this musing about teaching children that snow is black (or various shades of gray, if that proved to be more economical).
“It is to be expected that advances in physiology and psychology will give governments much more control over individual mentality than they now have even in totalitarian countries.
…education should aim at destroying free-will, so that, after pupils have left school, they shall be incapable, throughout the rest of their lives, of thinking or acting otherwise than as their schoolmasters would have wished. …
Diet, injections, and injunctions will combine, from a very early age, to produce the sort of character and the sort of beliefs that the authorities consider desirable, and any serious criticism of the powers that be will become psychologically impossible.”
Please let the weight of those words sink in. Due to diet, injections, and state education—from a very early age—challenging the state will “become psychologically impossible.” The design of public education is to destroy free will, to produce citizens incapable of thinking for themselves or believing anything different than what the state has taught them. Again, are we not there now?
Once more, let’s look to see where all of this is going:
“Even if all are miserable, all will believe themselves happy,
because the government will tell them that they are so.”
That sounds an awful lot like “eat bugs, own nothing, and be happy” to me, how about you? This is all directly contrary to human nature, is it not? Who is happy when the master makes them eat bugs? Who is happy when the master takes their things? Who is happy when their entire life is reduced under despotism to living as slaves?
Only those whose souls have been “nourished” by the government, that’s who.
As for the rest of us: RESIST WE MUST!