Got drones?
I have friends who have drones. They’re pretty cool gadgets, and obviously they’ve proven to have nearly endless uses. Matter of fact, I know a guy who helps build drones, and he once gave me a tour of the facility. It was neat and generally unassuming, but the state-of-the-art, cutting-edge capabilities were truly impressive.
Over the last decade there has been a meteoric rise in drone warfare. Nowadays, we think nothing of drone attacks ending lives in far off lands—when not that long ago, October 14, 2011, Americans were shocked to learn President Barack Hussein Obama had authorized the use of a drone strike to kill an American citizen on foreign soil.
Remember that story?
Obama's legal argument for droning an American citizen without trial, explained
U.S. airstrike that killed American teen in Yemen raises legal, ethical questions
There were righteous howls of protest from liberals for a few news cycles, as you might imagine, but strangely enough they continued to hail Obama as a hero. Overall, according to the Council of Foreign Relations, Obama authorized 542 drone strikes that killed an estimated 3,797 people, including 324 civilians—at least four of which were American citizens who had been radicalized by Islamic terrorists.
It’s a pretty fascinating part of recent history, and look how far we’ve come.
Today we are being told that the Pentagon is preparing for drone-on-drone battles to defend American military bases, as the entire Middle East erupts into chaos:
Drone-on-drone battles seem like something straight out of a sci-fi thriller, and yet it’s happening. It’s been just over a year, but you may recall we’ve covered the threat of “AI-powered killer robots” before. From TR 447 - How to Defeat AI-powered Killer Robots, September 8, 2023:
Are you aware of the AI-powered killer robots that are about to shape our future?
Evidently “human-machine teams” are about to unleash Hell on Earth, like something straight out of Hollywood. What’s unbelievable to me, is that anyone would promote this sort of remote killing—where a kid is playing a video game, directing swarms of AI-driven weaponized drones, and killing real people on their digitized battlefield.
I mean, what could possibly go wrong?!
Interestingly enough, that report unearthed an article from DefenseNews.com, with this headline: “Pentagon’s counter-drone office to demo swarm destruction in 2024.” If one were to read between the lines, it might be inferred that since the Pentagon was planning to “demo swarm destruction in 2024,” what we are witnessing right now was in fact plotted out long ago.
Are we about to watch the Military Industrial Complex give a little flex?
What might this demonstration of “swarm destruction” actually look like?
No doubt it would look awesome, like a real life video game. If you think about it, it would probably even be fun to be wielding this awesome power, right? I mean, gosh, with swarms of killer drones coordinating their attacks via artificial intelligence, it seems like we should be able to hunt down and kill all of the terrorists pretty quickly, right? And come on, if that’s not for the greater good, then what is?
Do you see where I’m going with this?
What happens when these chickens come home to roost?
Rand Paul was quick to make this point over ten years ago, when he pressed the CIA Director John Brennan to confess there were no geographical limitations on the use of drone strikes. Thus, at least theoretically, since Obama justified the use of killing American civilians with drones and Brennan admitted that there are no geographical restrictions, the U.S. government could use drones to target American citizens on American soil—but I’m sure that will never happen.
To flesh this out, I’d like to throw a little excerpt from TR 447 into the mix:
I believe they are priming the public conscience to accept the idea that remote-controlled robots are killing people, as if it’s all just par for the course. Why do I believe that? Well, because they’ve been building the narrative for years—and always about this time of year. Notice the pattern:
(Oct 2020) — New Weapons, Proven Precedent: a Treaty on Killer Robots
(Dec 2021) — US rejects calls for regulating or banning ‘killer robots’
(Nov 2022) — San Francisco's Killer Robots Threaten the City's Most Vulnerable
Over the course of just three short years, we’ve moved from a Treaty of Killer Robots, to the U.S. rejecting these regulations, to “it’s time we talk about it,” to killer robots are threatening the most vulnerable (who isn’t vulnerable to a killer robot?), to the bluntly stated fact: “Robots are already killing people.”
So, here we are, another year down the road, and we are staring at the same exact pattern, are we not? I’ll tack on a few more recent articles to punctuate the point:
(Jan. 2024) — 'Killer robots' are coming, and U.N. is worried - Harvard Gazette
(Sept. 2024) — Threat of 'killer robots' increasingly realistic, warns expert
And, just to make sure this threat hits home, to counteract the natural tendency to think these sorts of things could only happen some place far, far away, get this:
Ban the local police from using killer drones?
Meh. That’s so last-year’s liberal.
The progressive thing to do now, is to spend billions of dollars funding drone warfare and “swarm destruction” all around the world, and to be even edgier, fight to ensure that police can use killer drones on American citizens right here at home.
Now that’s some progressive shit right there.
It has all the hallmarks of the radical left, if you think about it—to quote Bill Ayers:
“Kill all the rich people. Break up their cars and apartments. Bring the revolution home, kill your parents, that’s where it’s really at.”
Can you imagine the carnage if a guy like that got his hands on a swarm of killer drones? Care to guess how many crazy SOB’s like him are out there today?
If we combine that sort of leftist radicalization with the media’s demonization of “MAGA extremists” and the Deep State’s labeling of political opposition as domestic terrorists, what we find is a perfect scenario to provide cover for the eradication of rebellious peasants who refuse to give up their guns and bow to the increasingly omnipotent power of the state.
The extermination could be conducted with killer drones, but alas, that’s obviously just wild speculation. Nobody knows how this game might play out.
What I want to emphasize today is that all of this has been in motion for much longer than most people realize. I’d point to George Soros writing, in 1993, about using Ukrainians as cannon fodder to spare NATO body bags in their ongoing effort to undermine the Russian Empire, as a prime example.
If you are unfamiliar with “Toward a New World Order: The Future of NATO” you should get up to speed here:
Among other things, that 1993 essay penned by Soros makes it explicitly clear:
“There is a discrepancy between the needs of the world for a New World Order and the national self-interest of the United States.”
In a similar vein, to quote David Rockefeller writing in 2002:
“Some even believe we are part of a secret cabal, working against the best interests of the United States…If that’s the charge, I stand guilty, and I am proud of it.”
The point here, is that there are some very powerful people who have been working for a really long time to institute the New World Order—aka Global Democracy—and they are not about to let a bunch of uppity peasants stand in their way.
They have no qualms with using drone strikes against civilians, obviously. Indeed, in an unclassified CIA document titled “The Rise of the Killer Drones: How America Goes to War in Secret,” there is a veritable laundry list of drones being used covertly in operations around the globe since the Vietnam War.
Fifty years later, the Deep State is quite cavalier about the “lethal convenience” of drones—i.e. “death by remote control”—to the point they even brag about it:
“Both the Pentagon and the CIA like to brag about drone strikes that have successfully taken out enemy combatants… Defense Secretary Leon Panetta has called drones ‘the only game in town,’ and President Obama recently dismissed concerns about civilian casualties, insisting that he is not ordering ‘a whole bunch of strikes willy-nilly’.”
He may not have been “willy-nilly” about it, but in his own words: “Turns out I’m really good at killing people. Didn’t know that was gonna be a strong suit of mine.”
How’s that for some hope and change?!
As the political circus continues to entice and enthrall, as both sides continue to claim victory and being ahead in the polls, Americans would be wise to keep their eyes on the end game. JD Vance put a veritable smackdown on Tampon Tim Walz last night, and I’m holding out hope that he and Trump and can make it into the White House—but even that monumental achievement will not deter the cabal for long.
The self-interest of the United States stands in the way of the New World Order. The global “secret cabal” is proud of working against everything America stands for.
These are their words, not mine.
Assassinations. Nuclear war. Economic collapse. Killer drones. Civil war.
It’s all on the table. Just like Obama was bragging, these people are really good at killing people. Trump may be the guy in their sights at the moment, but as most liberty loving Americans already know, we’re all on the list.
Their ultimate aim is to kill the American Spirit. For the global elites, everything that’s happening is all just a game, and it’s a game they intend to win at all costs. If you are not prepared for the bumpy road ahead, your time is getting short.
Get your house in order and be ready for anything. Give your loved ones a few extra hugs and enjoy the luxuries that come with living in peace. The goodness of life is found in the little things. Blessings abound, even in the midst of chaos.
As for the cabal, we’ve gotta play the long game, which is why I like to say:
RESIST WE MUST!!
Share this post