It’s Monday, so let’s start the week off right by not talking about the Chinese weather balloon that flew over the United States sending surveillance data to China for days before Biden got up the pluck (or caved to the pressure) to shoot it down.
It’s the first Monday of a new month, so let’s skip all the crap about Trump and Biden squaring off in 2024, Chris Christie’s “gloomy prediction” that Trump would actually lose to Biden if there was a rematch, whatever farcical lies Biden may or may not be set to roll out in Tuesday’s State of the Union address, and the “five-alarm political crisis” of people no longer trusting the corrupt political establishment.
No, instead of talking about the political circus today, I’d like to turn our attention to another impending calamity, namely the “existential” threat of extinction which—according to the radical fanatical environmentalists—is suddenly upon us. Evidently, this week the “Climate Crisis” is so bad that “The Experts” are now suggesting Miami should start preparing for evacuation—leading by example if you will, to “force municipalities” across the country to get serious about climate change.
We could and we should mock these people, but we must do so without forgetting that they are in fact deadly serious—and they are currently running the show.
Not only are they acting out of a psychotic fear of destroying the planet, they are acting out of an unshakable conviction that they have a moral imperative to reduce the human population to a sustainable level, and they’ve built national and international consensus around their bogus science and monomaniacal ideas. These people are very well-organized and very well-funded, which makes them a force to be reckoned with.
At this point, not only are they advocating people flee from glistening coastal cities, you may recall last week Joe Biden was out floating a plan to convince people to stay home and not leave their homes as much—you know, so you don’t destroy the planet by leaving your house. This is all part of the 88-page U.S. National Blueprint for Transportation Decarbonization, which casts this ominous vision:
“The transportation sector is now the largest source of greenhouse gas emissions in the United States, contributing to the climate crisis that is worsening quality of life in cities, towns, and rural communities throughout America. Emissions from the transportation sector also contribute to poor air quality. In the United States, these effects disproportionately impact underserved and disadvantaged communities. To address the climate crisis, we must eliminate nearly all greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from the sector by 2050…”
Of course, they claim this is going to be a “whole-of-government” approach that leverages public-private partnerships, just like all the rest of their commie schemes to centralize control of our lives into the hands of unelected bureaucrats. Not surprisingly, after lamenting business as usual, this report indicates that “macroeconomic changes, new technologies, and behavioral drivers will influence future passenger and freight travel in major ways.”
What are these macroeconomic changes and new technologies? These are nothing less than the “components of a digital economy” that are currently being slow-rolled and implemented with little public notice. The digital economy, which is based on digital currency, will be a boon for the environment, but a major blow to liberty. That is what the “behavioral drivers” are all about—think about exorbitant tolls being electronically yanked from your bank account or getting penalized for driving more than your allotted number of miles, and you’ll get the gist of where this is headed.
Worse yet, noting that this report laments the fact that climate change has rebounded to pre-pandemic levels, some astute observers are keen to point out the possibility that at some point they simply decide to lock us down to save the planet:
“I can’t shake the feeling that this brings us one step closer to a declared “climate emergency.” You people can all stay locked down in your homes voluntarily to save the polar bears or we can declare an emergency and lock you down like we did during COVID.
That probably sounds like tinfoil hat territory to some of you, but is it really? Back during the early days of the lockdowns, social distancing rules and the rest of the madness, I was warning people about this.”
I’m glad I’m not the only one pointing out where all this is headed.
We’ve discussed how officials have long celebrated that the pandemic was good for the environment. It was back in TR 82 - Impending Doom & What Happens Next (almost a year ago!) that I first pointed out how Klaus Schwab had already connected COVID-19 and the Great Reset to the radical environmental agenda. Says Schwab:
"While for a pandemic, a majority of citizens will tend to agree with the necessity to impose coercive measures, they will resist constraining policies in the case of environmental risks where the evidence can be disputed." p.136
What’s the globalist plan to deal with all this resistance to “constraining” policies? Why not just declare that it’s an emergency situation! That report also cited the World Health Organization’s declaration that air pollution was to be deemed a “public health emergency”—with all the emergency powers that entails:
"According to the WHO, 90% of the world's population breathes air that fails to meet its safety guidelines, causing premature death of 7 million people each year and prompting the organization to qualify air pollution as a 'public health emergency'." p.139
That’s why U.S. government’s blueprint to decarbonize transportation places so much emphasis on a) not leaving your home, and b) walking, biking, or taking public transportation if you do. They file this under “safety and quality of life,” because “walking, biking, and rolling” are safer than driving a car, plus it helps save the planet and reduce pollution. That’s why they’re investing so much in “Active Transportation” infrastructure, which is a central tenet in the broader Sustainable Development scheme.
It all sounds good, doesn’t it? Save the planet. Keep people safe. Why not just do what they suggest, hang up the keys, and forego the urge to freely roam about, rampaging the planet in our gas guzzling carbon emitting mechanical chariots?
Surely that’s what the good humans will do—and they’ll do it voluntarily—because that’s what good humans do. And you want to be a good human don’t you?
That’s what the “behavioral drivers” are all about—convincing people to play along, and punishing them if they don’t. If you’re still unsure about all this “good human” business, rest assured that the “constraining policies” will be designed to coerce your compliance. Keep in mind that this comes straight from the horses mouth, though Schwab adds the slight twist that the globalists intend for you to “agree” with this coercion—or else—which is completely oxymoronic.
Klaus Swab goes on to say that the COVID-19 crisis cannot go to waste, “NOW is the time to enact sustainable environmental policies.” He claims that populations need to be “spurred by a different narrative” and that governments should be emboldened by the “new social conscience” that is being pushed by activists. Says he:
“The moment must be seized to take advantage of this unique window of opportunity to redesign a more sustainable economy for the greater good of our societies.”
Did you catch that?
One crisis links to another: Covid connects public health with environmental health, which emboldens tyrants and activates a new social conscience that ultimately leads to redesigning the global economy—all for the greater good of course.
Just one final nugget lets us grasp the full plan:
“Governments led by enlightened leaders will make their stimulus packages conditional upon green commitments.” —The Great Reset p. 145
Enlightened leaders, eh?
I wonder if Kim Cobb qualifies as an enlightened leader— you know the psychotic sobbing mother who couldn’t even take care of her children because Trump got elected, who is now an Intelligence Advisor for Biden—we know she’s a frothing-at-the-mouth environmentalist, so does that mean she’s enlightened?
Are the morons who think we should evacuate Miami enlightened leaders? How about those idiots who are shooting particles into the atmosphere to block out the sun, are they enlightened leaders? How about the “enlightened leaders” who recently met in Montreal for the Convention on Biological Diversity, who declared that “human induced extinction” can only be halted by imposing their radical agenda on the whole entire world—are these the enlightened leaders we should listen to?
Evidently so, whether you agree with them or not. You see, this radical environmental agenda is “but a first step in resetting our relationship with the natural world.” And lest you casually dismiss these nut jobs as fringe quacks, understand that “the entire United Nations System is geared to support its implementation so that we can truly make peace with nature.”
It reminds me of something I read one time:
“Leave room for nature - Leave room for nature.”
Remember that whole plan for depopulating the planet? If you need to brush up:
In a nutshell, these people are nuts.
But like I said, they’re running the show. While everybody is watching the political circus, they continue to advance their radical depopulation agenda and the public is none the wiser—except for the “woke” of course, who are cheering them on. Fools.
If we don’t rise up and ‘vote’ to immediately remove these people from positions of power, their lunacy may very well lead to the death of us all—or at the very least, solidify the extinction of free will and everything good about life as we know it.
It’s time we start talking about the insanity of these so-called “enlightened” leaders. Please help me get the word out by sharing this post!