As I was saying…
The threat of AI-enhanced global censorship is the biggest issue that is not being talked about. While everyone is still fretting over who opened the door when the police arrived to find Paul Pelosi wrestling over a hammer with a psychotic hippie (who may or may not have been in his underwear), America’s own ex-officiale Ministry of Truth has been busy convening behind closed doors to collude with Big Tech in a vast scheme to streamline state sponsored censorship.
According to public records brought to light by a lawsuit filed against “President Biden and other top-ranking government officials”—for their collective colluding to “censor free speech, including truthful information related to COVID-19, election integrity, and other topics, under the guise of combating “misinformation”—we now know that our tax dollars are being used to silence free speech.
Digging in, as reported by The Intercept:
“DHS’s mission to fight disinformation, stemming from concerns around Russian influence in the 2016 presidential election, began taking shape during the 2020 election and over efforts to shape discussions around vaccine policy during the coronavirus pandemic. Documents collected by The Intercept from a variety of sources, including current officials and publicly available reports, reveal the evolution of more active measures by DHS.”
So, this is a mission to “fight disinformation” that specifically affects elections. Logically speaking, that would mean that this effort is also directly affecting the elections, does it not? In other words, government agencies are using taxpayer money to censor the information available to voters ahead of elections—and all of this began to really take shape during the 2020 election.
This should really be shocking to anyone who claims to value “free and fair” elections. How are our elections free or fair if public discourse is being manipulated by government censorship, and this effort is being paid for with taxpayer dollars?
Worse yet, as with all government programs, the scope of this state funded operation quickly expanded to include censoring any counter-narrative news about the origins of the Wu Flu, dehumanizing medical mandates, emergency authorization of sketchy genetic injections, and other pandemic related concerns—as well as anything else that might reflect poorly upon the most popular president ever elected:
“According to a draft copy of DHS’s Quadrennial Homeland Security Review, DHS’s capstone report outlining the department’s strategy and priorities in the coming years, the department plans to target “inaccurate information” on a wide range of topics, including “the origins of the COVID-19 pandemic and the efficacy of COVID-19 vaccines, racial justice, U.S. withdrawal from Afghanistan, and the nature of U.S. support to Ukraine.”
So there you have it. You only get to say what they want you to say—at least some day, if the government continues to have their way, and we let them get away with it.
Hence the importance of sharing the truth with your friends:
It’s good. It’s bad. It’s ugly.
That high profile legal cases are being brought against these authoritarian schemes is indeed good news. The bad news is that the majority of people will never know about it. The masses will remain ignorant to their own manipulation because the mainstream media will not inform them of this ugly truth. Instead, they will continue to peddle the state sanctioned truth and declare that it’s Trusted News.
There are two points that I want to emphasize here:
This collusion to censor the flow of information using 21st century tools like Artificial Intelligence is already being deployed at the global level.
This DOES NOT mean that all counter-narrative news will immediately disappear and be taken down—that would be far too obvious.
These people are pernicious, they’re not stupid.
If the global cabal simply removed all public dissent instantly with the single click of a button—which in theory they have the capacity to do—what would happen?
The peasants would get pissed. What the hell is going on here? If they are being so bold in their tyranny, what will they not do? Maybe it’s time we fight back, you know, before they come door-to-door looking for papers, or hammers, or whatever?
No, no, that path might lead to violence. They’d rather win without firing a shot—or at least without getting shot at or threatened with a hammer. Think strategy.
Perhaps we should frame the possibilities this way.
There is information that exists that counters the approved narrative.
The more people that view this information, the more people are going to question the narrative.
The fewer people who view this information, the fewer people are going to question the narrative.
THEREFORE: It is not necessary to completely remove all of this information.
By reducing the spread of this information by some calculated percent—so that the majority of people never see it, for example—they can control public sentiment.
I’m not a coder, but I imagine the programmers setting up the machine learning and algorithmic solutions might code in something like this:
If 20% of the public is expressing doubt about the narrative, THEN reduce the circulation of “misinformation” by 20%, initiate public reeducation campaigns, and use light censorship until public support for the state narrative improves.
If 80% of the public is openly challenging the narrative, THEN reduce the circulation of “misinformation” by 80%, launch offensive campaigns to target public influencers, and shadow ban and de-platform repeat offenders.
Of course, those are just two hypothetical scenarios whipped up by an ignorant peasant pecking away at his keyboard. I’m sure the brilliant minds behind the global effort to control the flow of information have a much more sophisticated way of doling out the censorship—like letting the AI decide, for example.
Here’s the thing: To what extent they are already doing this, we will never know. If they shut it all the way down, it would be obvious. But if they are just reducing the number of people who are getting the information, there is really no way of knowing—except we know that they have openly declared their explicit intent to do so.
I believe they have declared this intent to inoculate the masses against any major revolt against state censorship. They are conditioning the masses to believe that this is necessary. Misinformation is dangerous. Disinformation is a threat to democracy. When people believe Russian propaganda, it will interfere with our elections—that’s why our own government is using state-run propaganda to shore up our elections.
You know the drill.
As keen observers have pointed out:
“This is despotic, and in its attempts to marry government to industry to suppress speech, it’s literally fascist. And it is clearly unconstitutional to boot.”
There is no doubt that governments around the world are censoring free speech to manipulate political outcomes. There is no doubt that this means the global cabal is actively installing presidential puppets in positions of power all around the world.
There is no doubt that these initiatives are intended to advance the global socialist agenda and enslave humanity into a dystopian hell—though few put it that way.
What remains in doubt, is whether or not enough people speak out against this insidious plot and motivate our elected leaders to publicly campaign against it.
Time will tell. Today is the 1st of November. The midterm elections are just seven short days away. The big surprise this cycle is that the invisible hand is using taxpayer funded state-sanctioned censorship to tip the political scales in broad daylight—and that the apathetic masses remain completely unaware.
What do we do? We must think strategically.
The best way to combat this plot is to share truthful information in our own circle of influence. Word of mouth, face to face, heart to heart, we must talk about what’s going on. That’s the first step. Seek opportunities to have the conversation. Ask:
What do you think about the State using our taxes to silence dissent?
How do you feel about weaponized AI being used to censor public debate?
Where do you draw the line between disinformation and a dystopian hell?
Conversations like this can catalyze action. When people sense that something’s wrong, and figure out how to put words to it, then it’s time to up the game.
Maybe you write a letter to your state representatives or the local newspaper. Maybe you gather a group of family and friends for the specific purpose of talking about the issue. Maybe you take the uncomfortable step of sharing this with someone you know.
The eradication of free speech is not an issue of left versus right. This shouldn’t be a political football. People need to understand that any attack on “misinformation” is ultimately an attack on public debate. At it’s core, this is nothing less than a compulsive urge to control what you can and cannot say, to control what you think, and ultimately control the way you view the world.
If they succeed, they will be able to control what you believe.
When they control what you believe, they will control your actions, how you behave, and how you vote. This is how they will condition you to be a good human. This is how the masses will lose their humanity and become mental slaves. This is how the global cabal consolidates power and the commies take over the world.
It goes without saying that this is a very bad thing, but it would be wise to speak this truth loud and clear—and spread it far and wide—for as long as we still can!