Here we go.
While the mainstream media continues to focus on the very real destruction caused by Hurricane Ian—a once in 500 years event, according to Governor Desantis—and continues pumping the public psyche full of pre-election polling for the sake of political theater, the impact of the Baltic Sea Bombing continues to ripple around the world. Take a look at the latest spin:
As this story continues to evolve, and the narrative begins to take shape, there is no doubt there will be more and more significance attached to the destruction of the Nord Stream pipelines. That said, the fact that media still remains relatively quiet on this truly historic event has me thinking:
What if this was not part of the plan?
What if this was an independent operation conducted by rogue agents from a corrupt regime, pulled off without official notice or state approval? What if these evil masterminds never ran it by the global cabal before they bombed the Nord Stream?
That would certainly throw a wrench in things, and it would account for the mad scramble to craft a narrative. From another angle, if this were being orchestrated at the highest levels, the public messaging would have been pre-packaged and promptly paraded out and puppeted by the globalists’ propaganda machine.
In TR 206 - An Interesting Twist, we examined the backstory on the EU energy crisis and I pointed out that destroying the pipeline that supplies nearly 40% of Europe’s natural gas would have catastrophic impact—and yet this has yet to hit the headlines.
In TR 207 - The Baltic Sea Bombing, we learned that the CIA warned Germany about the potential attack weeks in advance, that underwater drones had been used in the area, and that the Biden administration’s official stance was adamantly against the pipeline—and yet this has yet to hit the headlines, and likely never will.
How did the CIA know about the threat? Where were they picking up this chatter? What did Germany do with this information? So many questions remain unanswered.
What’s going on?
Well, the Germans have determined that, due to the 500-kilograms-of-TNT equivalent explosion that registered 2.3 on the Richter Scale, this act of sabotage must have been conducted by a nation state. According to German news sources:
“The previously unknown estimates support the assumption that only a state actor can be behind the action. So far, the federal government has held back with speculation about the background to the interruption of the pipelines.
There is a lot of speculation that Russia is behind the action.
In security circles it was said that divers or a remote-controlled robot could possibly assess the damage at the weekend. In the best-case scenario, one could then draw initial conclusions about the type of explosion under water and the explosives used, according to security circles. However, it is difficult to predict how many traces can still be found.” (emphasis added)
Of course, in theory, they already knew all of that thanks to the CIA. After pointing out that “only a state actor” could have pulled this off, it should come as no surprise that they speculate Russia is behind the attacks—because of course Russia would want to destroy its own $35 billion dollar pipeline and terminate its perennial cash flow, because that’s just what evil tyrants do!
Not to be too political, NATO has condemned these attacks as reckless and disturbing, without deliberately pointing a finger. From their official statement:
“All currently available information indicates that this is the result of deliberate, reckless, and irresponsible acts of sabotage. These leaks are causing risks to shipping and substantial environmental damage. We support the investigations underway to determine the origin of the damage.”
It’s worth noting that the U.S. State Department said essentially the same thing in a press briefing yesterday:
“We are, as part of our assistance to the investigation, sharing information we may have on these acts, on these apparent acts of sabotage. …
We have more questions than answers at this point. We’re not going to get ahead of the investigation. An investigation like this, owing to the nature of the investigation, — underwater, for one – could well take time. So we’re going to allow the investigation to play out before we start to lay out theories or hypotheses.”
What strikes me as interesting is the idea that this investigation may take time. If they already had intel indicating a threat to the pipeline—and shared that information weeks ago—then what’s stopping them from going public with proof that Russia! Russia! Russia! was behind it all along?
At one point a reporter pointed out that at least one foreign official had openly thanked the U.S. for the sabotage, to which the State Department replied:
“The idea that the United States was in any way involved in the apparent sabotage of these pipelines is preposterous. It is nothing more than a function of Russian disinformation and should be treated as such.”
So much for the investigation then, eh? If the results of an investigation point fingers at anyone but Russia, that would clearly be a function of Russian disinformation. Don’t forget this is already being branded a “Russian terrorist attack” by European outlets—and I would anticipate we will be seeing the same headlines hit here at home sooner than later, but there’s something else going on right now.
It’s all about the timing.
We are only 40 days out from the midterm elections.
Gosh, it sure wouldn’t look good if the Biden administration got caught red-handed sabotaging the Nord Stream pipeline—this act of sabotage is climate catastrophe! Not to mention it would be a gross violation of international laws and destabilize global order, potentially plunging the world into war! Biden would never do that—he’s too sharp to be suckered into such shenanigans, he’s too wise to be so stupid!
Right. But rogue deep state agents? That’s a whole different potential. What if Biden didn’t know about it—you know, like plausible deniability? Not that he’s really in the loop anyhow, being the sock-puppet that he is. Regardless, is it possible that this Nord Stream narrative could somehow be leveraged for political advantage ahead of the elections? Rest assured this question is top of mind for Biden’s handlers.
Here’s another question: How might nuclear war affect the upcoming elections?
Deeper still: How might any of this be used to the benefit of the global cabal?
Don’t lose sight of the invisible hand. While it’s possible that a few rogue operatives pulled off this high-profile hit, it is much more likely they were just following orders. Who gave the orders? What’s the strategic advantage of mission accomplished?
The world is inching closer to World War III. The pieces are in place.
And just in the nick-of-time, the UN has offered us a Renewed Vision for Peace:
“New domains of conflict are opening, and new tools emerging, and we do not have strong sets of rules to govern them.
The International Crisis Group has highlighted the need to address these new weapons—everything from social media, to drones, to artificial intelligence.”
Did you catch that? Social media is a weapon—that’s where the Russian’s spread their misinformation. In fact, at last week’s UNGA conference, the New Zealand’s fearless leader went so far as to claim internet freedom (i.e. free speech) was a “weapon of war.” What do you think?
The UN’s solution to international conflict is controlling the narrative. When they control the narrative, they can control elections. When they control the elections, they control the policy. When they control the policy, they control the people.
Will the referendum elections in Ukraine represent the will of the people? According to the narrative coming from the State Department, the answer is absolutely not:
“First, Russia has now announced the pre-baked results of its sham referenda. These results were concocted in Moscow, not collected in Ukraine. Let’s be clear: The results are completely fabricated and do not reflect the will of the people of Ukraine. This is the will of Moscow, not the free will of Ukraine or its people.”
Too bad we can’t just ask the people who voted, right? I guess we should just trust what the government tells us—that way we’re not getting misinformation.
Will the upcoming elections in America represent the will of We the People?
That too will depend on the narrative, and apparently it’s still being developed.